Navigation
This lesson teaches students to spot errors in reasoning that can undermine an argument.
Have you ever lost an argument even though you knew you were right, simply because the other person's reasoning felt 'off' but you couldn't name why? What if you could spot the exact moment a person's logic breaks down?
In rhetoric, an argument is like a building; it needs a solid foundation to stand. A logical fallacy is a 'glitch' in reasoning that makes an argument invalid. Even if the conclusion sounds true, the path taken to get there is broken. Think of it as a shortcut that actually leads you off a cliff. When people use fallacies, they often rely on emotions or distractions rather than actual evidence. Learning to spot these is like having a 'nonsense filter' for your brain, helping you navigate everything from political debates to TikTok comments.
1. Definition: An ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person') attacks the individual making the argument rather than the argument itself. 2. Scenario: Person A says, 'We should invest more in the school library because reading scores are down.' 3. Fallacy: Person B responds, 'Why should we listen to you? You failed your last English test!' 4. Analysis: Person B didn't address the library or the scores; they just attacked Person A's character.
Quick Check
If someone says 'You're too young to understand the economy,' instead of explaining why an economic policy is bad, which fallacy are they using?
Answer
Ad hominem
The Straw Man fallacy happens when someone takes your argument, simplifies it into something ridiculous, and then attacks that 'fake' version. It is much easier to defeat a man made of straw than a real person. In formal logic, if your original argument is , your opponent pretends you said (a much weaker version of ) and then proves is wrong. This creates the illusion that they have defeated your original point, even though they never actually touched it.
1. Original Argument: 'I think we should have less homework on weekends so students can rest.' 2. Straw Man Response: 'So, you want to abolish all education and let students be lazy and uneducated for the rest of their lives?' 3. Analysis: The opponent turned 'less weekend homework' into 'abolishing education.' By attacking the extreme version, they avoid discussing the actual benefits of rest.
Quick Check
Why is the 'Straw Man' fallacy effective in a fast-paced debate?
Answer
It makes the opponent's position look extreme or ridiculous, making it easier to 'win' the audience's favor without using real evidence.
1. The Claim: 'If we let students use tablets in class for research, they will eventually stop writing by hand. If they stop writing, they will lose all fine motor skills. Soon, no one will be able to use a fork or tie their shoes, and civilization will crumble.' 2. The Breakdown: The jump from 'using tablets' to 'civilization crumbling' is unsupported. 3. The Logic: It assumes (tablets) must lead to (collapse) without proving the intermediate steps are unavoidable.
A politician says, 'My opponent's plan for healthcare is bad because he was once fired from a job.' This is an example of:
Which fallacy follows the logic chain where is an extreme disaster?
A Straw Man fallacy involves accurately representing an opponent's argument before disagreeing with it.
Review Tomorrow
In 24 hours, try to recall the three fallacies we covered and think of one example for each from a recent commercial or social media post you've seen.
Practice Activity
Watch a 5-minute debate or news clip and tally how many times you hear an attack on a person's character (Ad Hominem) versus an attack on their actual ideas.