Navigation
A study of Immanuel Kant's ethics, focusing on the importance of duty and the nature of the act itself.
Imagine a world where everyone lied whenever it was convenient. Would the concept of a 'promise' even exist anymore, or would language itself break down?
For Immanuel Kant, morality isn't about the consequences of your actions. It doesn't matter if your lie saved a life or if your charity helped a thousand people; what matters is your motive. Kant argues that the only thing in the world that is 'good without qualification' is a Good Will. A person has a good will when they act out of a sense of duty—doing the right thing simply because it is the right thing to do. This approach is called Deontology, derived from the Greek word deon, meaning duty. Unlike other theories that look at the 'end result,' Deontology focuses on the 'nature of the act' itself.
Quick Check
According to Kant, if a person gives to charity just to look good on social media, is that action morally 'good'?
Answer
No, because the motive was self-interest rather than a sense of duty.
Kant distinguishes between two types of commands, or imperatives. A Hypothetical Imperative is conditional: 'If you want , then do .' For example, 'If you want to pass the exam, you must study.' These are not moral rules; they are just practical advice. In contrast, a Categorical Imperative is an absolute, unconditional requirement that must be obeyed in all circumstances. It takes the form: 'Do .' Morality, Kant argues, consists entirely of categorical imperatives because moral laws apply to all rational beings regardless of their personal desires or goals.
1. Scenario A: 'I should tell the truth so that people will trust my business.' (Hypothetical: The goal is business success). 2. Scenario B: 'I should tell the truth because lying is inherently wrong.' (Categorical: The action is a duty regardless of the outcome).
Quick Check
Which type of imperative is 'If you want to stay healthy, you should exercise'?
Answer
Hypothetical Imperative.
How do we know what our duty is? Kant provides the Formula of Universal Law. He states: 'Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.' A maxim is simply the rule or principle behind your action. To test if an action is moral, ask: 'What if everyone did this?' If the result is a logical contradiction or a world that no rational person would want, the action is immoral. This is the Universalizability Test.
1. Maxim: 'I will make a promise I intend to break to get out of a financial problem.' 2. Universalize: Imagine everyone makes false promises when they need money. 3. Contradiction: If everyone lied, the very concept of a 'promise' would disappear. No one would believe anyone, making it impossible to successfully make a false promise. The action 'self-destructs' logically.
A famous challenge to Kant: A murderer knocks on your door asking for the location of your friend who is hiding inside. 1. Kant's strict view: You cannot lie, because 'Do not lie' is a categorical imperative. 2. Logic: If you universalize lying (even for a good cause), you destroy the integrity of truth. 3. Result: You are responsible for your own duty (telling the truth), but you are not responsible for the evil actions of the murderer.
What is the primary focus of Kantian Deontology?
Which of these is a Categorical Imperative?
Kant believes that if a lie produces a very good outcome, it is morally permissible.
Review Tomorrow
In 24 hours, try to explain the 'Universalizability Test' to someone else using the example of cutting in line at a grocery store.
Practice Activity
Identify one 'maxim' you followed today (e.g., 'I will help a friend to be kind'). Ask yourself: 'Would the world still function if every single person followed this rule at all times?'