Navigation
An exploration of the four principles of bioethics with a focus on patient rights and informed consent.
Imagine a doctor knows a surgery will save your life, but you refuse it because of your personal beliefs. Does the doctor have the right to operate against your will to 'save' you, or is your right to choose more sacred than your survival?
In modern medicine, ethical dilemmas are resolved using the 'Georgetown Mantra,' a framework of four principles. Autonomy is the right of the patient to make their own healthcare decisions without coercion. Beneficence is the duty of the provider to act in the patient's best interest. Non-maleficence is the foundational commitment to 'do no harm.' Finally, Justice ensures that medical resources and risks are distributed fairly across society. Let the set of principles be represented as . While these principles are meant to work together, they often conflict, requiring an 'ordering' of values to reach a decision.
Quick Check
If a doctor refuses to perform a requested but medically useless surgery, which principle are they primarily upholding?
Answer
Non-maleficence (and potentially Beneficence), as they are avoiding unnecessary harm to the patient.
Historically, medicine operated under Medical Paternalism, where the physician acted as a 'father figure,' making decisions for the patient's 'own good'—often without their input. This prioritized beneficence over autonomy. Today, the ethical landscape has shifted. We now recognize that a patient's values are as important as clinical data. The tension arises when a patient's choice results in a negative health outcome . In a paternalistic model, the doctor chooses ; in an autonomous model, the doctor respects even if it leads to .
1. A 30-year-old patient requires a life-saving blood transfusion. 2. The patient, being a Jehovah's Witness, refuses the treatment on religious grounds. 3. The doctor believes the transfusion is the only way to satisfy beneficence. 4. However, because the patient is competent, the doctor must respect autonomy and withhold the blood, even if the outcome is fatal.
Quick Check
True or False: In modern bioethics, beneficence always overrides autonomy if the patient's life is at risk.
Answer
False. For competent adults, autonomy generally overrides beneficence.
For autonomy to be meaningful, Informed Consent must be obtained. This is not just a signed paper; it is a process. Ethicists require three criteria: 1. Disclosure: The patient must be told the risks, benefits, and alternatives (). 2. Capacity: The patient must be mentally able to understand the information. 3. Voluntariness: The decision must be free from 'undue influence' or coercion. In clinical trials, this is even more rigorous because the primary goal is often scientific knowledge rather than the direct benefit of the participant.
1. A researcher offers $10,000 to homeless individuals to participate in a high-risk Phase I drug trial. 2. While the participants sign a disclosure form, the high payment may constitute 'undue inducement.' 3. This compromises voluntariness, as the participants may feel they have no choice but to accept the risk due to their financial status. 4. This also raises issues of Justice, as a specific vulnerable population is bearing the risk for a drug that will likely benefit wealthier populations.
A controversial exception to informed consent is Therapeutic Privilege. This occurs when a physician withholds information because they believe disclosure would cause the patient 'serious psychological harm.' Critics argue this is a 'paternalistic loophole' that undermines autonomy. To evaluate this, we must weigh the probability of harm against the patient's right to know . If , does the doctor have a right to lie? Most modern ethicists say no, arguing that honesty is required to maintain the 'fiduciary' (trust-based) relationship.
1. A patient with severe dementia is enrolled in a study by their legal guardian. 2. The study offers no direct benefit to the patient but could help others with the same condition (Justice). 3. Since the patient lacks capacity, they cannot give informed consent. 4. The ethical challenge: Is it ever right to use a person as a 'means to an end' for science if they cannot personally consent to the risk?
Which principle is most directly concerned with the fair distribution of healthcare resources?
If a patient is pressured into a surgery by their family, which element of informed consent is missing?
Therapeutic privilege is widely accepted by modern bioethicists as a standard way to protect patient autonomy.
Review Tomorrow
In 24 hours, try to recall the four pillars of bioethics and define the three requirements for informed consent without looking at your notes.
Practice Activity
Research the 'Tuskegee Syphilis Study' and write down which of the four principles were violated and how the criteria for informed consent were ignored.