Navigation
A sensitive examination of the moral arguments surrounding physician-assisted dying and palliative care.
If you were in unbearable pain with no hope of recovery, would you want the right to choose when your story ends, or is life a gift that no one—not even you—has the right to discard?
To discuss end-of-life ethics, we must first define our terms. Active Euthanasia occurs when a medical professional takes a direct action to end a patient's life, such as administering a lethal injection. Passive Euthanasia involves withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (like a ventilator), allowing the patient to die from their underlying condition. Finally, Assisted Suicide (or Physician-Assisted Dying) occurs when a doctor provides the means (like a prescription), but the patient performs the final act. The moral debate often hinges on whether there is a significant difference between 'killing' and 'letting die.' Some philosophers argue that if the intent and the outcome are the same, the method is secondary; others believe the distinction is the foundation of medical ethics.
Consider a patient, , who is in a permanent vegetative state. 1. The family requests the removal of a feeding tube. 2. The doctor complies, and dies of natural causes related to their inability to eat. 3. This is Passive Euthanasia. It is legally and ethically distinct from active intervention in many jurisdictions because the doctor is 'allowing nature to take its course' rather than introducing a new cause of death.
Quick Check
What is the primary difference between active euthanasia and assisted suicide?
Answer
In active euthanasia, the doctor performs the final act; in assisted suicide, the patient performs the final act using means provided by the doctor.
The debate is often framed as a clash between two core principles. The Sanctity of Life principle suggests that human life has intrinsic value that is not dependent on its condition. This is often a deontological view, suggesting a moral duty to preserve life at all costs. Conversely, the Quality of Life principle argues that the value of life is tied to the patient's experience. If a life is defined only by suffering or a lack of consciousness, a utilitarian might argue that ending that life is the more compassionate choice. This perspective prioritizes autonomy—the right of the individual to make decisions about their own body and destiny.
A utilitarian might evaluate a case using a 'hedonic calculus.' 1. Let represent total utility (well-being). 2. If the pain () outweighs any possible future pleasure or meaning (), then . 3. If is significantly negative and cannot be improved, the utilitarian may argue that euthanasia is the morally 'correct' path to minimize total suffering in the world.
Quick Check
Which principle would a philosopher be using if they argued that 'life is a gift from God and must never be shortened'?
Answer
The Sanctity of Life principle.
Critics of euthanasia often use the Slippery Slope argument. They suggest that legalizing euthanasia for the terminally ill (Step ) will inevitably lead to the devaluation of life for the disabled, the elderly, or the mentally ill (Step ). They fear that the 'right to die' will eventually become a 'duty to die' to save resources. To navigate these murky waters, some use the Doctrine of Double Effect. This rule states that an action with a bad effect (death) is permissible if the intent was a good effect (relieving pain), and the bad effect was a foreseen but unintended side effect. For example, a doctor may give high doses of morphine to stop pain, knowing it might also suppress breathing and hasten death.
Imagine a doctor, , treats a patient, , with a terminal illness. 1. administers a dose of medication . 2. The intent of is to eliminate pain (). 3. A side effect of is the cessation of respiration (). 4. Under the Doctrine of Double Effect, if is the primary goal and is not the means to achieve , the action is often considered ethically acceptable, even if leads to death. This is a crucial 'middle ground' in palliative care.
If a doctor provides a patient with a lethal prescription that the patient later takes themselves, this is classified as:
Which argument suggests that legalizing voluntary euthanasia will lead to involuntary euthanasia?
The 'Doctrine of Double Effect' states that an action is immoral if it has any foreseeable negative consequences, regardless of the intent.
Review Tomorrow
In 24 hours, try to recall the three main differences between active euthanasia, passive euthanasia, and assisted suicide without looking at your notes.
Practice Activity
Research the current laws in your country or state regarding 'Medical Aid in Dying' (MAID). Does your local law align more with the 'Sanctity of Life' or 'Quality of Life' principle?