Navigation
Learn how misrepresenting someone's argument makes it easier to attack but harder to find the truth.
Have you ever had someone 'put words in your mouth' and then get mad at you for things you didn't even say?
In a real fight, it is hard to knock down a trained athlete. But it is very easy to knock down a scarecrow made of straw. In logic, the Straw Man Fallacy happens when someone ignores your actual position and replaces it with a distorted, exaggerated, or misrepresented version. By attacking this 'straw' version, they make it look like they have won the debate, even though they haven't addressed your real point. It is a shortcut that avoids the hard work of truly understanding a complex idea. Instead of dealing with the truth, they deal with a fake.
Quick Check
If an opponent changes your argument to make it sound ridiculous before attacking it, what fallacy are they committing?
Answer
The Straw Man fallacy.
Straw men usually follow a specific pattern. First, Person A makes a claim. Then, Person B restates that claim in a way that sounds extreme or silly. Finally, Person B attacks that silly version. Look for phrases like 'So what you're saying is...' or 'You just want to...' followed by something you never actually said. This often involves oversimplification, where a complex plan is reduced to a single, bad idea. It's like trying to describe a whole forest by pointing at one dead tree.
1. Person A: 'I think we should have more salad options in the cafeteria.' 2. Person B: 'I can't believe you want to ban pizza and burgers! If we only eat leaves like rabbits, the students will have no energy to study!' 3. The Logic: Person B created a Straw Man by pretending Person A wanted to ban other foods, which was never said.
Quick Check
In the example above, did Person A actually suggest banning pizza?
Answer
No, they only suggested adding more salad options.
To avoid this fallacy and become a master of the Art of Argument, you should do the opposite: Steel-manning. This means you summarize your opponent’s argument so well that they say, 'Thanks, I couldn't have said it better myself.' Only after you have built their 'Steel Man' (their strongest possible version) should you try to find the flaws in it. This leads to the truth rather than just 'winning' a fight. It turns a battle of egos into a search for the best answer.
Scenario: A parent wants to limit video games to 1 hour a day. 1. Straw Man: 'You just want me to have no friends and be bored for the rest of my life!' 2. Steel Man: 'You are worried that too much screen time is affecting my sleep and my grades, and you want to make sure I have a healthy balance of activities.' 3. Result: By using the Steel Man, the conversation becomes about health and balance rather than 'being mean.'
Scenario: A city proposes a small tax on plastic bags to reduce litter. 1. Task: Identify the Straw Man and create a Steel Man. 2. Straw Man: 'The government is trying to steal our hard-earned money and control every single thing we do at the grocery store!' 3. Steel Man: 'The city is looking for a financial incentive to encourage citizens to use reusable bags, aiming to lower the cost of cleaning up local parks and oceans.'
Why is it called a 'Straw Man' fallacy?
Which phrase often signals that a Straw Man is being built?
Steel-manning means making your own argument sound as loud as possible.
Review Tomorrow
In 24 hours, try to recall the difference between a 'Straw Man' and a 'Steel Man' and explain it to a family member.
Practice Activity
Watch a short debate or news clip and listen for the phrase 'So you're saying...' to see if the speaker is misrepresenting the other person's view.